From emergence
to evanescence: repression, migration, and the transformation of identity in
Azerbaijan under soviet occupation
Dr. Vazeh ASGAROV
Doctor of the University of Strasbourg
Vice-Rector of the Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University (ASOIU)
Email: vazeh.askarov@asoiu.edu.az
Keywords:
emigration, national identity,
russification policy, soviet Azerbaijan, cultural resistance
Abstract
This article analyzes the impact of
Soviet occupation on Azerbaijani national identity, examining processes of
repression, forced migration, and cultural transformation. Russification
policies, the elimination of elites, and the modification of names and cultural
practices contributed to a partial loss of identity, while inciting significant
cultural resistance. The resilience of the Azerbaijani people, especially after
independence in 1991, underscores the persistence of a national spirit. The
study offers a nuanced understanding of identity mutation within the Soviet
context.
Introduction
Contemporary Azerbaijani history is
deeply shaped by the Soviet period, marked by radical transformations of
national identity. Since the Bolshevik regime’s establishment in 1920,
Azerbaijan has undergone repression, forced migrations, and cultural homogenization
driven by russification policies. This complex context raises questions about
the society’s capacity to resist and preserve its cultural specificities amid
these assimilation efforts. Such policies have left lasting effects on both
society and the very perception of Azerbaijani identity. This study explores
how repression, forced migration, and cultural change contributed to both the
emergence and loss of Azerbaijani identity, highlighting cultural resistance by
the people facing adversity.
1. Historical and political context
of soviet occupation
Soviet occupation of Azerbaijan in
1920 initiated a tragic period involving emigration, repression, and profound
shifts in national identity. Many Azerbaijanis fled abroad to escape terror and
persecution, while those remaining fought against an oppressive regime aiming
to eradicate dissent. Despite the pain, this history embodies resilience,
demonstrating the Azerbaijani people's determination to preserve their culture
and identity. This era continues to inspire contemporary generations seeking
freedom and recognition.
The Soviet invasion led to the fall
of the Democratic Azerbaijan, the first in the Muslim East. On April 27, 1920,
Soviet rule began, and a new wave of elite emigration ensued—researchers term
this “elite emigration.” Intellectuals, embodying the spirit of freedom, became
initial victims, exemplified by the first massive international deportation in
Soviet history in 1922.
Following Bolshevik power’s arrival,
lists of enemies were prepared under Ponkratov’s responsibility, aimed at
eliminating perceived enemies—politicians, clergy, aristocrats, and scholars
educated in Europe, as well as active former communists involved in building
Soviet power. Led by Lenin and Trotsky, the Soviet authorities created colonies
for prisoners, becoming the earliest form of mass exile. Thousands of
revolution opponents and prominent figures were sent to these colonies.
2. Forced migration and the exodus
of elites
Mass arrests occurred across
Azerbaijan hundreds of members of the Musavat Party accused of resisting Soviet
power were sentenced to death. Ten Azerbaijani generals were executed without
trial. Notably, through figures like Narimanov, Generals Shikhlinski and
Mehmandarov escaped such atrocities.
Contrary to some beliefs that
deportations started in the 1930s, these events began during the early
Bolshevik governance, amidst Russia’s civil war, with roots tracing back to
Tsar Peter the Great. Azerbaijan experienced several repression phases,
starting in the early 1920s—targeting peasants, politicians, religious figures,
and landowners—and later extending to nationalists, Musavatists, and
Pan-Turkist leaders until the 1930s. The most brutal period was during the
Stalinist “Great Purges,” especially 1936–1939, where approximately
70,000–80,000 prominent Azerbaijanis—scientists, writers, military, religious
figures—were massacred, disappeared, or exiled, with the execution machine
operating relentlessly for mere minutes per victim.
3. Resistance and rebuilding of
national identity
Given their Muslim and Turkic ties,
Azerbaijanis were seen as a potential threat by the Soviet regime in the South
Caucasus. For instance, while Georgians and Armenians kept their alphabets,
Azerbaijanis’ scripts were altered twice—first from Arabic to Latin, then to
Cyrillic following Turkey’s adoption of Latin script under Kemalist influence.
Similar discrimination extended to surnames: Georgian and Armenian surnames
retained their suffixes (-ian, -yan, -dze, etc.), whereas Azerbaijani surnames
often saw suffixes like -khan or -bey removed or replaced with Russian-style
endings (-ov, -ev).
During Soviet period, names were
modified—sometimes with names of historical figures replaced by absurd ones
related to collectivization (e.g., Tractor, Revolution, Council, October,
Marlen). After independence in 1991, traditional Azerbaijani names and
suffixes—such as -li, -zade, -oğlu—began to reemerge, signifying geographical
origins, aristocratic ties, and kinship. Currently, simplifying name endings
has become common, a reflection of continuing Russian/Soviet influence, similar
to patterns seen in other Turkic-speaking nations like Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan,
and Turkmenistan.
In Uzbekistan, for example, Russian
suffixes are still retained. Crimean Tatars are increasingly shunning Russian
suffixes, preferring simpler forms. In Latvia, the authorities mandated
removing Russian suffixes like -ov, -ev, adding an -s at the end of names to
“Latvianize” them.
Conclusion
Ultimately, Soviet occupation left
an indelible mark on Azerbaijan’s demographic, cultural, and identity
landscape. Through relentless repression, mass migrations, and assimilation
policies aimed at erasing national distinctiveness, the Azerbaijani people
endured profound suffering and transformation. Nonetheless, the spirit of
resistance and cultural preservation persisted, enabling the rebirth of
national identity with independence in 1991. This journey—marked by loss but
fueled by resilience—demonstrates the capacity of peoples to defend their roots
amid oppressive histories. Today, Azerbaijan continues to forge its path,
reconnecting with traditions and asserting sovereignty amid a process of
reconstruction and cultural renaissance.
Bibliography
1.
Constant Antoine (2002) L'Azerbaïdjan, Karthala (Méridiens), Paris.
2. Arzumanlı Vaqif, Mustafa Nazim (1998), Tarixin qara səhifələri, Deportasiya. Soyqırım.
Qaçqınlıq, Bakı,
Qartal.
3. Arzumanliı Vaqif (2001) Azerbaycan
Diasporu, Bakı, Qartal.
4. Bünyadov Ziya (1993), Qırmızı terror (Terreur rouge), Bakı,
Azərnəşr.
7. Asgarov
Vazeh (2014) L’immigration des Azerbaïdjanais, L'immigration générale des Azerbaïdjanais, histoire et
perspectives : le cas de la France, Allemagne,
PAF, p.425.
8. Asgarov
Vazeh (2022) L'immigration des
Azerbaïdjanais en France, Edition Kapaz, Strasbourg, France,
ISBN: 978-2-492157-03-5, p.341.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire